Health risks of secondhand smoke

The Health Risks of Secondhand Smoke Are Exaggerated, according to an conjure up written by W. Kip Viscusi, which is published in 1997 in Smoking, Opposing View head words. The term, is not in effect(p). non only be the sources of the show not clearly identified, scarcely also Viscusi uses logical f whollyacies, and the formation is confusing.         The first drive why Viscusis article is not effective is that the sources of the evidence Viscusi uses ar not clearly identified. To begin with Viscusi duologue virtually how the percentages of non-smokers in society have risen, then he says to consider the sideline Gallup Poll results, which are that the 16% believed that smoking in macrocosm places should be banned. But Viscusi fails to tell the ratifier what the Gallup poll is, when it was taken and who produced it. Equally important, in the seventh carve up Viscusi states that genus Cancer researchers generally note. Again he fails to let the reade r quiet to hitchher the documentation of the cancer researchers. Another example of wretched security is when Viscusi states some percentages in a 1991 survey of confederacy smoking policies. He again fails to let the reader know the credentials of the survey.         Another explanation as to why Viscusis article is not successful is because the organization is confusing.

The dissertation Viscusi is trying to picture is that the health risks of secondhand smoke are exaggerated. He fails to restrain his thesis because his main points in his story are all mixed-up and have no organization. Als o, Viscusis main point is that risks are exa! ggerated, alone he fails to bring out the risks until after the he writes about insignificant topics that have nothing to do with the point he is trying to make. In addition to not keep his thesis and scattering the main points, Viscusi also fails to stick... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay